Hi Bin, On 1 November 2016 at 04:07, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> On 12 October 2016 at 17:56, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> Hi Bin, >>>> >>>> On 6 October 2016 at 14:59, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>>> Change x86 boards to use binman to produce the ROM. This involves adding >>>>> the >>>>> image definition to the device tree and using it in the Makefile. The >>>>> existing ifdtool features are no-longer needed. >>>>> >>>>> Note that the .dtsi file is common and is used for all x86 boards. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v4: >>>>> - Remove RFC tag >>>>> - Use binman for all x86 boards >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v3: >>>>> - Put the binman definition in u-boot.dtsi >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - Add automated test coverage >>>>> - Put the binman definition in a common file for x86 >>>>> - Various changes and improvements based on using this tool for a while >>>>> >>>>> Makefile | 45 +++-------------------------------- >>>>> arch/x86/dts/u-boot.dtsi | 62 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/dts/u-boot.dtsi >>>> >>>> What do you think of this patch? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, I will try to look at this in a day or two. >> >> Did you get a chance to take a look at this? >> > > Looks the python import error was caused by an incorrect installation > of python. I will try to have a look tomorrow.
OK, that's odd! - Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
