Hi,

On 14/11/16 16:30, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> wrote:
>> Somehow an int returning function without a return statement sneaked
>> in. Fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c
>> index 67c7edd..7502314 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c
>> @@ -158,9 +158,10 @@ static void spi0_disable_clock(void)
>>                              (1 << AHB_RESET_SPI0_SHIFT));
>>  }
>>
>> -static int spi0_init(void)
>> +static void spi0_init(void)
>>  {
>>         unsigned int pin_function = SUNXI_GPC_SPI0;
>> +
> 
> Space not needed or unrelated, please  remove this.

This is Linux coding style, which U-Boot adheres to.
"WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations"

I thought I should fix this since this is was in the context of this
very simple patch and it improves readability.
If this is too much, then please remove the line before committing.

Thanks!
Andre.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to