On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Andre Przywara <[email protected]> wrote:
> Apparently the indentation is off here, for the IGB model just want to
> bail out early.
> Fix this to avoid both compiler warnings and puzzled readers.
>
> Pointed out by GCC 6.2's -Wmisleading-indentation warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/e1000.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000.c b/drivers/net/e1000.c
> index 3332ad9..875682b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000.c
> @@ -1522,11 +1522,10 @@ e1000_initialize_hardware_bits(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>                 reg_txdctl1 |= E1000_TXDCTL_COUNT_DESC;
>                 E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, TXDCTL1, reg_txdctl1);
>
> -       /* IGB is cool */
> -       if (hw->mac_type == e1000_igb)
> -               return;
>
>                 switch (hw->mac_type) {
> +               case e1000_igb:                 /* IGB is cool */

Too bad you didn't take this opportunity to drop the worthless comment. Oh well.

Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <[email protected]>

> +                       return;
>                 case e1000_82571:
>                 case e1000_82572:
>                         /* Clear PHY TX compatible mode bits */
> --
> 2.8.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to