Hi Denk,
drivers/block/pata_bfin.c uses sata.h and can use commands in
cmd_sata.c.
drivers/block/mg_disk.c uses mg_disk.h and can use commands in
cmd_mgdisk.c.
drivers/block/sil680.c, hm.., I don't know what cmd it uses.
There's also ATAPI in cmd_ide.c, which uses code in Pcs440ep.c.
They are all ATAPI, But use different interface.
There is no ata common function definitions.
I just wonder if I should create a new interface, like cmd_pata.c and
mxc_pata.h for my ata.
Actually, sata interface is ok for use in my ata. But it may make
customer confused.
I don't want to add redundant code for ata, so I just ask if there is a
better implementation for ata.
Thanks~~
Yours
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2009年10月21日 17:37
To: Lv Terry-R65388
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] pata support in u-boot
Dear "Lv Terry-R65388",
In message
<1ae74f652ecb1440b73dd7c2c20842d19a6...@zch01exm27.fsl.freescale.net> you wrote:
>
> I'm trying to add our ATA driver to u-boot.
Fine.
> But it seems that now u-boot only supports SATA.
This is not correct. U-Boot also supports ATA/ATAPI, SCSI, USB, PCMCIA,
Systemace, ...
> ATA is mixed with ide in cmd_ide.c.
Indeed.
> There is no ata common interface in include.
Hm... so include/ata.h is not what you are looking for>
> Is this suitable?
I'm afraid I don't understand what exactly your problem is.
drivers/block/mg_disk.c, drivers/block/pata_bfin.c or drivers/block/sil680.c
seem to show that the current code actually can be used with ATA interfaces.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] The
following statement is not true. The previous statement is true.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
