On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:53:05AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2017-02-22 8:16 GMT+09:00 Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 03:24:53PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> The prompt of this option is marked "DEPRECATED" in capital letters, > >> and its help clearly says: > >> This option was prepared for the smooth migration from the old > >> configuration to Kconfig. Since this option will be removed sometime, > >> new boards should not use this option. > >> > >> However, we have had almost no progress on this. In fact, this > >> option is often abused for fresh porting, and more and more new > >> defconfigs with it are coming in (for example, SUNXI boards). > > > > That's not entirely true. We've added more defconfig, but with the > > same set of options we've always had, and are shared by everyone > > (CONS_INDEX, RGMII). > > > > So this patch, in effect, gives the signal that it's better to have a > > proliferation of board-specific headers in include/configs, over using > > SYS_EXTRA until most of the generic functions are merged? > > No. > > I am saying to add > CONFIG_CONS_INDEX=2 > CONFIG_RGMII=y > > instead of > > CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS=CONS_INDEX=2,RGMII" > > Why proliferation of board-specific headers?
Because of all the other platforms that would need to be migrated in the process. If what you suggest is just to remove all the defconfig that have that kind of option, I'll just move to what everyone else does: have it in my header. Because that's just the path of least resistance. But that just seems counter-productive. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
