On 20 February 2017 at 03:28, Jacob Chen <jacobchen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-02-17 4:44 GMT+08:00 Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: >> Hi, >> >> On 14 February 2017 at 23:41, Jacob Chen <jacob2.c...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>> Hi Kever, >>> >>> >>> Kever Yang wrote on 2017年02月15日 14:13: >>>> >>>> Hi Jacob, >>>> >>>> On 02/15/2017 11:06 AM, Jacob Chen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We should remove config_spl_of_platdata to build u-boot-spl-dtb.bin >>>>> rather than u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin >>>>> since we use spl_back_to_brom. >>>> >>>> >>>> Have you try with CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA on and without SPL_BACK_TO_BROM? >>>> >>>> If this works on firefly, then we can still leave it as an example to show >>>> how both way works. >>>> >>> >>> Firefly had been using CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA and it works well. >>> Just it will make trouble for other things to generate the u-boot blob, >>> like yocto, sdk build scripts, guides... >>> >>> At first, I also want to keep CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA in firefly, but later >>> I find that i have to do a lot of unnecessary work to deal with it, >>> so now I would like one chip use one way to generate the u-boot blob. >> >> How about having a separate board config like firefly-rk3288-dt so >> that we keep the non-of-platdata alive? It only needs a separate >> defconfig, which is pretty esay. >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> _______________________________________________ >> U-Boot mailing list >> U-Boot@lists.denx.de >> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > > > I send a patch "rockchip: firefly: configs: add a new config to keep > non-of-platdata" to save old config.
OK thanks. Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
