On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 01:19:12PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Wed 2017-03-08 @ 12:20:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:57:58AM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > > On Wed 2017-03-08 @ 10:35:19 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > perhaps we can do -N --no-omgic (which negates most of what -N does > > > > > > Unfortunately "-N --no-omagic" doesn't succeed either (same problem): > > > > > > arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd: u-boot: Not enough room for program > > > headers, try linking with -N > > > > OK. Lets dig a little harder. Do you have an older binutils around as > > well? It would be good to compare the objdump between the older version > > and newer version with -N passed in as well. Thanks! > > No problem, OpenEmbedded FTW!! ;-) > (it's quite easy to switch between them and build, using OE) > > Would comparing the map files suffice? If I build u-boot twice (once with > binutils-2.27 and once with binutils-2.28) and add the "-N" flag to the > linking for both builds, comparing the map files I get: > > $ diff -u 2.27-with-N/u-boot.map 2.28-with-N/u-boot.map > --- 2.27-with-N/u-boot.map 2017-03-08 13:05:32.380107036 -0500 > +++ 2.28-with-N/u-boot.map 2017-03-08 13:07:50.240330617 -0500 > @@ -7084,6 +7084,7 @@ > > .data 0x0000000000043678 0x296c > *(.data*) > + .data.rel.ro 0x0000000000043678 0x0 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > .data.rk3288_otg_data > 0x0000000000043678 0x2c > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/built-in.o > .data.rk3288_dmc_ops > @@ -7946,6 +7947,9 @@ > *(.rel*) > .rel.got 0x0000000000047cc0 0x0 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > .rel.plt 0x0000000000047cc0 0x0 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > + .rel.bss 0x0000000000047cc0 0x0 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > + .rel.data.rel.ro > + 0x0000000000047cc0 0x0 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > .rel.iplt 0x0000000000047cc0 0x0 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > .rel.text 0x0000000000047cc0 0x20 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > .rel.vectors 0x0000000000047ce0 0x38 > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > > > > If this isn't what you're looking for, please suggest what you'd like and I'll > give it a try.
That's very close :) What does 2.27 without -N look like compared with 2.28 with -N ? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
