On 03/20/2017 05:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 20 March 2017 at 06:24, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/20/2017 02:53 AM, Eddie Cai wrote: >>> 2017-03-17 5:26 GMT+08:00 Marek Vasut <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On 03/15/2017 08:56 AM, Eddie Cai wrote: >>>>> rockusb is a protocol run between host pc and device. it help people get >>>> device >>>>> info, flash image to device. this patch implement rockusb on device side. >>>> >>>> What is the benefit of this yet-another NIH protocol compared to ie. >>>> DFU/UMS/Thor/Fastboot ? >>>> >>> This is mostly used on Rockchip chipset. All the rockchip SoC boot rom and >>> develop tools implement this protocol. >>> So we want to use the same protocol which compatible with current tools. >> >> This does not really answer my question. We have protocols which >> implement exactly this functionality already, why do we need another one ? > > I think the point is that this is widely used with Rockchip devices, > and for mainline U-Boot to be fully useful it needs to support it.
OK, I'll leave that decision to Lukasz . I'm not a big fan of adding redundant functionality only because someone thought NIH is good before looking at standards. > However I do think it would be good to move to using DFU etc. if possible? Yes. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
