On 17 April 2017 at 22:00, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On 17 April 2017 at 09:48, Philipp Tomsich
> <philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
>> In (first) breaking and (then) fixing the rkspi tool, I realised that
>> the calculation of the required padding (for the header-size and the
>> 2K-in-every-4K SPI layout) was not as self-explainatory as it could
>> have been. This change rewrites the code (using new, common functions
>> in rkcommon.c) and adds verbose in-line comments to ensure that we
>> won't fall into the same pit in the future...
>>
>> Tested on the RK3399 (with has a boot0-style payload) with SD/MMC and SPI.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com>
>> ---
>>
>> tools/rkcommon.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>> tools/rkcommon.h | 10 ++++++++--
>> tools/rksd.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
>> tools/rkspi.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>

Applied to u-boot-rockchip/next, thanks!
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to