{Corrected typo u-boot mailing list.}
Hi Lukasz
>> Since spl-dfu does not dfu-reset, there is no need of
>> run_command_cli, hence compiling out cli.c and cli_hush.c to reduce
>> the spl-dfu memory foot print.
>>
[..]
>> */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DFU_TFTP
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DFU_TFTP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
>And then somebody would like to use DFU TFTP in the SPL (like you use
>DFU) and we would have new set of problems.
>Sorry, but this is a wrong approach.
I agree with you for TFTP use-case.
But as aligned, in order to reduce SPL size, use SPL-DFU to load and execute
u-boot from RAM.
And then use complete DFU facility in u-boot for flashing MMC/SF/NAND etc.
I don't see any harm to allow for DFU_TFTP in SPL.
And SPL shall not support CONFIG_DFU_{MMC/NAND/SF} or any memory device except
DFU_RAM.
Regards
Ravi
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
