Am Dienstag, 16. Mai 2017, 09:19:57 CEST schrieb Kever Yang: > > On 05/16/2017 02:51 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Hi Kever, > > > > Am Montag, 15. Mai 2017, 21:18:00 CEST schrieb Kever Yang: > >> - Add some rk3399 and rk3328 boards; > >> - use rkdeveloptool instead of rkflashtool; > >> - use opensource.rock-chips.com instead of wikidot; > >> - other update. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> > >> doc/README.rockchip | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/doc/README.rockchip b/doc/README.rockchip > >> index 2d8cf9f..229db0d 100644 > >> --- a/doc/README.rockchip > >> +++ b/doc/README.rockchip > >> @@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ many Rockchip devices [1] [2]. > >> The current mainline support is experimental only and is not useful for > >> anything. It should provide a base on which to build. > >> > >> -So far only support for the RK3288 and RK3036 is provided. > >> - > >> - > >> Prerequisites > >> ============= > >> > >> @@ -26,17 +23,18 @@ You will need: > >> - Power connection to 5V using the supplied micro-USB power cable > >> - Separate USB serial cable attached to your computer and the Firefly > >> (connect to the micro-USB connector below the logo) > >> - - rkflashtool [3] > >> - - openssl (sudo apt-get install openssl) > >> + - rkdeveloptool [3] > > In my personal opinion, rkflashtool should stay. You can very well add > > rkdeveloptool as a second option, but rkflashtool was there first and > > also is the one that most distributions contain in their repositories. > > And both tools seem to have the same functionality. > > OK, it can leave there, but I don't know why it does not works well with > rk3399.
I'd guess most likely because it is missing the soc-specific id for the rk3399 [0]. Heiko [0] https://github.com/linux-rockchip/rkflashtool/blob/master/rkflashtool.c#L103 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
