Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> wrote on 17/11/2009 22:06:02:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message <[email protected]>
> you wrote:
> > The #include <asm/byteorder.h> is Linux specific. Use
> > compiler.h and adjust the code to cope.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Mike, how does this work for you?
>
> Could you please do me a favour and mark your patches in some way so
> everybody knows what these are?
This was a "reply" for Mikes comment on
[PATCH v2] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()
Would it been better for you if I just included the patch
in a normal email reply?
>
> Is this for inclusion into mainline (I guess not) or intended for
> testing - you should use something like "[PATCH RFC]" in the Subject
> then.
I think the crc32 patch(es) are ready to go in after the pending release.
>
> Also, when reposting new versions of this stuff then please mark the
> version in the Subject (like '[PATCH RFC v5]"), and provide a history
> of changes between the versions below the "---" line.
>
> And PLEASE keep the In-reply-to: and References: headers so threading
> of the messages works.
Since this was a new email sent with git, I don't In-reply-to: and References:
should be there?
Anyhow, I can send a V3 version with everything in it to sum it up?
Jocke
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
