Am Samstag, den 12.08.2017, 20:29 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Max,
> In message <20170812090346.7887-2-max.krummenac...@toradex.com> you wrote:
> > Different SoCs have different RAM layouts, so providing
> > $(CONFIG_LOADADDR) instead of the constant 0xc100000 for
> > CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR is probably more appropriate.
> At least the wording of the Subject should be fixed.
Ok, will do. The issue is that linking the standalone application
to have its text segment at a hardcoded address is less
likely to work than using an address provided by the board
configuration as a possible load address.
Will reword the commit message in a v2 series accordingly.
> It is fundamentaaly broken to associate the names "loadaddr" and
> "entry point" with each other. Both are completely independent
> entities which mean totally different things. It is pure chance if
> the entry point of some loaded image should be at the very beginning
> of this image, but this is almost never the case.
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang Denk
U-Boot mailing list