On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Bin,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On some flash (like Macronix), QE (quad enable) bit is in the same
>>>>>>> status register as BP# bits, and we need preserve its original value
>>>>>>> during a reboot cycle as this is required by some platforms (like
>>>>>>> Intel ICH SPI controller working under descriptor mode).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>>>>>>> index 0034a28..7d8c660 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>>>>>>> @@ -947,11 +947,24 @@ int spi_flash_scan(struct spi_flash *flash)
>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info))
>>>>>>> return -ENOENT;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - /* Flash powers up read-only, so clear BP# bits */
>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>> + * Flash powers up read-only, so clear BP# bits.
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Note on some flash (like Macronix), QE (quad enable) bit is
>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>> + * same status register as BP# bits, and we need preserve its
>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>> + * value during a reboot cycle as this is required by some
>>>>>>> platforms
>>>>>>> + * (like Intel ICH SPI controller working under descriptor
>>>>>>> mode).
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SPI_FLASH_CFI_MFR_ATMEL ||
>>>>>>> - JEDEC_MFR(info) == SPI_FLASH_CFI_MFR_MACRONIX ||
>>>>>>> JEDEC_MFR(info) == SPI_FLASH_CFI_MFR_SST)
>>>>>>> write_sr(flash, 0);
>>>>>>> + if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SPI_FLASH_CFI_MFR_MACRONIX) {
>>>>>>> + u8 sr = 0;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + read_sr(flash, &sr);
>>>>>>> + sr &= STATUS_QEB_MXIC;
>>>>>>> + write_sr(flash, sr);
>>
>> Better assign sr with QEB for macronix and call write_sr once.
>
> For these Macronix flashes that does not support quard RW, QEB bit is
> reserved. Writing 1 to a reserved bit is not a good practice.
Yeah, i.e what I'm concern here. (apart from fixing comment) this
issue came-up with your controller along with specific connected chip
which support RW WEB.
What if we couldn't preserve QEB? because if user need quad operation
anyway code will check QEB if not it will enable.
thanks!
--
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
