On 08/13/2017 02:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi York, > > On 7 August 2017 at 17:16, York Sun <york....@nxp.com> wrote: >> SPL supports U-Boot image in FIT format which has data outside of >> FIT structure. This adds support for embedded data for normal FIT >> images. >> >> Signed-off-by: York Sun <york....@nxp.com> >> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: >> Rebase on top of "SPL: FIT: factor out spl_load_fit_image()" by Andre >> Przywara >> >> common/spl/spl_fit.c | 52 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> > > There is some docs here: > > doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt > > I feel that what you have here should be documented in some way, > associated with SPL. Any ideas?
Yes. That's my plan. I have been waiting for Andre to comment on the priority of "kervel" vs "firmware". I believe it makes sense to favor "kernel" when falcon boot is enabled. The U-Boot image shouldn't contain "kernel" node in falcon boot scenario. Or it can be changed to "standalone" as Andre did for U-Boot image (to favor "loadables"). York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot