Hello Tom, I just read some days ago about the kernel Coding-Style:
<quote> Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists. An example of a good name could be ``out_free_buffer:`` if the goto frees ``buffer``. Avoid using GW-BASIC names like ``err1:`` and ``err2:``, as you would have to renumber them if you ever add or remove exit paths, and they make correctness difficult to verify anyway. </quote> Does is make sense to follow this for U-Boot also and fix the names of the labels below? > > free(fdt_overlay_stacked_copy); > +err3: > free(fdt_overlay_copy); > +err2: > free(fdt_base_copy); > +err1: > free(uts); > Best regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
