On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> wrote: >> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about >> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing >> reg property in that node. >> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the >> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> >> --- >> board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The > documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too. > > I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells > properties?
If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot dts wrt Linux dts sync. thanks! -- Jagan Teki Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer Hyderabad, India. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
