On 06-Nov-2017 3:37 PM, "Kever Yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jegan, On 11/02/2017 03:32 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kever Yang <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Rockchip use a 'loader2' partition for U-Boot, so u-boot.bin or >> u-boot.itb load by SPL need to locate at0x4000. Detail here: >> http://opensource.rock-chips.com/wiki_Boot_option >> > Sorry, I'm not clear is this because of arm64 itb? and we should have > 16320 sectors in between SPL and U-Boot which is huge isn't it? > No, this is nothing to do with arm64 itb. You can over write this in your board if you use a different partition table from Rockchip one. We use 0x4000 because we have use this value for many years for U-Boot image, no matter it's uboot.img or u-boot.bin or u-boot.itb, I think it's better to sync this value for all Rockchip plaltform including Linux and Android OS in all SoCs. Sorry, this I didn't understand we left 8M between SPL and U-Boot. What exactly the use case I never observed any issue case like this. Can you please elaborate, I understand I can override this but what to know because generally falcon configuration itself start just from 2M _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
