On 11/17/2017 03:06 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
On 12 November 2017 at 07:02, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
Provide a test for the EFI_DEVICE_PATH_TO_TEXT_PROTOCOL protocol.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
v2
no change
---
lib/efi_selftest/Makefile | 3 +
lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_devicepath.c | 340 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 343 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_devicepath.c
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
I wish we could just use 0 instead of EFI_SUCCESS
0 does not convey any meaning to me. This is why I tend to use
* NULL instead of 0 and
* EINVAL instead of 22.
But obviously this is a matter of taste.
Regards
Heinrich
and if (!xx) to check for success.
The source code is looking too much like EFI for my liking!
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
