On 12/24/2017 03:24 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 01:40:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 12/22/2017 06:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> In order for these commands to not be included in SPL we need to guard >>> compilation with CONFIG_SPL_BUILD checks. Reorganize some sections of >>> code slightly in order to avoid new warnings and mark the command >>> functions as static as they should have been before. >> >> I'd expect the gc sections to collect those, is that no longer the case? > > It collects things in the general case, yes, gc sections collects > things. In the case of linker lists, since we include them, no, they > don't get discarded. > >> Do these commands actually land in the SPL and does this patch make any >> size difference ? > > Yes, they're included in SPL today and this patch causes them to not be. >
OK, I'll pick it and push it as part of the socfpga PR. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
