> On 25 Jan 2018, at 11:09, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonog...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 18/01/18 11:21, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 18/01/18 01:31, Kever Yang wrote:
>>> I don't think we can reuse IH_TYPE_TEE， it use a optee.img type create by
>>> mkimage and it seem use more then one cpu.
>> Don't really understand what you mean by using more than one CPU - can you
>> give an example in the code ?
> So - what's the proposed resolution here ?
Where do we stand on this: can we reuse IH_TYPE_TEE, will be use IH_TYPE_OPTEE
or will there be a new IH_TYPE_OPTEE_SPL?
This series has been hanging in limbo for the better part of January and it
seems as if just a naming issue is holding it back at the moment…
U-Boot mailing list