On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Lukasz Majewski <lu...@denx.de> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:04:46 +0000 > Alex Kiernan <alex.kier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> That said, squashing in that change doesn't obviously break anything >> for me, and is probably a step in the right direction. >> >> I'll see what Travis thinks. >> > > We will probably receive build breaks...
Yup... https://travis-ci.org/akiernan/u-boot/jobs/340344489 Just tried again on one of those failures (x600) with the the default removed and just set the on board that uses CONFIG_EXT, but that then fails at config time. TBH I'd actually like to take it out of Kconfig (which I realise is the wrong direction) as it just feels fundamentally wrong the way it is. I don't know what the U-Boot approach configuration like this is... struggling to find prior art. -- Alex Kiernan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
