On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add simple and meaningful kconfig option for prcm.c
>> instead of using MACH type on Makefile.
>> PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) is considered as a
>> Multi-Functional Device, so used the same on Kconfig definition.
>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>
>> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
>> index 1fededd..2b9f48b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
>> @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ config SPL_LDSCRIPT
>> config IDENT_STRING
>> default " Allwinner Technology"
>> +config MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
>> + bool "Allwinner A31 PRCM controller"
>> + help
>> + Support for the PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit available
>> + in A31 SoC.
> Do these entries even need to be visible?
> It's not like it makes sense to toggle them independently.
> This applies to almost all the patches in this series.
True with PRCM and DRAM and others shouldn't relate to arch code and
move to drivers in future.
U-Boot mailing list