On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 07:59:46PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Since 82b9dc63 ("Only build cli_readline.o for CMDLINE on non-SPL"),
> cli_simple.c is only being built for non-SPL case. However, dfu_mmc
> requires cli_simple.c to build and dfu fails to build for SPL when
> CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER is disabled.
>
> Therefore, limit dfu_mmc to non-SPL case only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/dfu/Makefile | 2 ++
> drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)Does DFU for MMC make sense inside of SPL? If so, you should follow 82b9dc63 and CONFIG_FSL_DDR_INTERACTIVE and bring back in cli_simple.o (and cli_readline.o, if needed) for CONFIG_SPL_DFU_MMC or so. If not, we should more cleanly and clearly block out all non-DFU RAM cases for SPL. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
