On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 07:59:46PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:

> Since 82b9dc63 ("Only build cli_readline.o for CMDLINE on non-SPL"),
> cli_simple.c is only being built for non-SPL case. However, dfu_mmc
> requires cli_simple.c to build and dfu fails to build for SPL when
> CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER is disabled.
> Therefore, limit dfu_mmc to non-SPL case only.
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dfu/Makefile | 2 ++
>  drivers/dfu/dfu.c    | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

Does DFU for MMC make sense inside of SPL?  If so, you should follow
82b9dc63 and CONFIG_FSL_DDR_INTERACTIVE and bring back in cli_simple.o
(and cli_readline.o, if needed) for CONFIG_SPL_DFU_MMC or so.  If not,
we should more cleanly and clearly block out all non-DFU RAM cases for
SPL.  Thanks!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

U-Boot mailing list

Reply via email to