Hi Marek, Thanks for this update and the detailed notes.
On 03/29/2018 06:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
When the DDR calibration is enabled, a situation may happen that it will fail on a few select boards out of a whole production lot. In particular, after the first write leveling stage, the MPWLDECTRLx registers will contain a value 0x1nn , for nn usually being 0x7f or slightly lower. What this means is that the HW write leveling detected that the DQS rising edge on one or more bundles arrives slightly _after_ CLK and therefore when the DDR DRAM samples CLK on the DQS rising edge, the CLK signal is already high (cfr. AN4467 rev2 Figure 7 on page 18). The HW write leveling then ends up adding almost an entire cycle (thus the 0x17f) to the DQS delay, which indeed aligns it, but also triggers subsequent calibration failure in DQS gating due to this massive offset. There are two observations here: - If the MPWLDECTRLx value is corrected from 0x17f to 0x0 , then the DQS gating passes, the entire calibration passes as well and the DRAM is perfectly stable even under massive load. - When using the NXP DRAM calibrator for iMX6/7, the value 0x17f or so in MPWLDECTRx register is not there, but it is replaced by 0x0 as one would expect. Someone from NXP finally explains why, quoting [1]: " Having said all that, the DDR Stress Test does something that we do not advertise to the users. The Stress Test iself looks at the values of the MPWLDECTRL0/1 fields before reporting results, and if it sees any filed with a value greater than 200/256 delay (reported as half-cycle = 0x1 and ABS_OFFSET > 0x48), the DDR Stress test will reset the Write Leveling delay for this lane to 0x000 and not report it in the log. The reason that the DDR Stress test does this is because a delay of more than 78% a clock cycle means that the DQS edge is arriving within the JEDEC tolerence of 25% of the clock edge. In most cases, DQS is arriving < 5% tCK of the SDCLK edge in the early case, and it does not make sense to delay the DQS strobe almost a full clock cycle and add extra latency to each Write burst just to make the two edges align exactly. In this case, we are guilty of making a decision for the customer without telling them we are doing it so that we don't have to provide the above explanation to every customer. They don't need to know it. " This patch adds the correction described above, that is if the MPWLDECTRx value is over 0x148, the value is corrected back to 0x0. [1] https://community.nxp.com/thread/456246 Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> --- arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/ddr.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/ddr.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/ddr.c index 43b77cfa41..6e5e40dd1a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/ddr.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/ddr.c @@ -85,6 +85,23 @@ static void modify_dg_result(u32 *reg_st0, u32 *reg_st1, u32 *reg_ctrl) writel(val_ctrl, reg_ctrl); }+static void correct_mpwldectr_result(void *reg)+{ + /* Limit is 200/256 of CK, which is WL_HC_DELx | 0x48. */ + const unsigned int limit = 0x148; + u32 val = readl(reg); + u32 old = val; +
Nit: I think "val &= 0xffff0000" would be slightly easier to read instead of the "<< 16":
+ if ((val & 0x17f) > limit) + val &= 0xffff << 16; + + if (((val >> 16) & 0x17f) > limit) + val &= 0xffff; + + if (old != val) + writel(val, reg); +} + int mmdc_do_write_level_calibration(struct mx6_ddr_sysinfo const *sysinfo) { struct mmdc_p_regs *mmdc0 = (struct mmdc_p_regs *)MMDC_P0_BASE_ADDR; @@ -176,6 +193,13 @@ int mmdc_do_write_level_calibration(struct mx6_ddr_sysinfo const *sysinfo) errors |= 4; }+ correct_mpwldectr_result(&mmdc0->mpwldectrl0);+ correct_mpwldectr_result(&mmdc0->mpwldectrl1); + if (sysinfo->dsize == 2) { + correct_mpwldectr_result(&mmdc1->mpwldectrl0); + correct_mpwldectr_result(&mmdc1->mpwldectrl1); + } + /* * User should issue MRS command to exit write leveling mode * through Load Mode Register command
Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
