>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> writes:
Hi, >> That seems like a good idea to me. > I've lamented before (and I think others have too) that it's really a > shame that gcc treats arm32 and arm64 as totally distinct builds (and > where clang is a win). But I don't think we can require people to have > both an arm and an aarch64 compiler available in order to build U-Boot > for some aarch64. No, please not. It would make it very hard to handle U-Boot builds in Buildroot for these boards. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
