On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:21:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >>>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Source: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg >>>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+ >>>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.) >>>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray >>>>>>>>>>> background >>>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do. >>>>>>>>>> How about this? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg >>>>>>>>> Lacks the teal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't want teal :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's >>>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :) >>>>>> Find Marek's darling appended >>>> >>>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this. But, did you >>>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one? I ask because the >>>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual >>>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials, >>>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good. >>>> >>>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :). >>>>> >>>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the >>>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue. >>>> >>>> We can worry about that later. >>> >>> I think the logo as here is fine: >>> >>> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg >> >> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with >> creative commons license? > > So, while I'm Not A Lawyer(TM), there is a reason lawyers have made > licenses that are still "open source" but for other things. One of the > uses of a logo is to be printed. What on earth does GPLv2 (or later) > compliance look like for a brochure or a t-shirt? That's not the > (usual) spirit behind why you would put a license like that on a thing > like this. This is why currently projects use one of the Creative > Commons 4.0 licenses for images, hardware design, etc. > > And further pushing my "not a lawyer", it's generally accepted that you > can go from CC-4.0 to GPLv3 (or later), you can't go the other > direction. And I'd also really rather not put people that want to use > our logo in the position of worrying about what GPLv2 compliance on an > image looks like (as it's not clear), I'm strongly in favor of a CC'd > image. > > If anyone can contact the actual author of the wikimedia image (it's not > the person that uploaded it, I dug that far) and have them agree to > re-license as CC, I'd be happy to go that route. Thanks! >
I have raised that question on: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CFCF#Circle-icons-submarine.svg _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
