On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 03:32:43PM +0800, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com>
>
> In ARM 64-bits, memory size can be supported is more than 4GB,
> hence increasing save array is needed to cope with testing larger memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com>
> ---
> common/memsize.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/memsize.c b/common/memsize.c
> index 5670e95..b091203 100644
> --- a/common/memsize.c
> +++ b/common/memsize.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> long get_ram_size(long *base, long maxsize)
> {
> volatile long *addr;
> - long save[31];
> + long save[BITS_PER_LONG];
> long save_base;
> long cnt;
> long val;Since BITS_PER_LONG is 32 or 64, shouldn't we use B_P_L - 1 here? Or are you saying there's also a case where this is wrong on 32bit today? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
