Hi Alex, On 20 June 2018 at 02:51, Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/20/2018 12:02 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> On 18 June 2018 at 08:45, Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/18/2018 04:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>>> >>>> Use a starting address of 256MB which should be available. This helps to >>>> make sandbox RAM buffers pointers more recognisable. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Nak, this has a non-0 chance of failing, in case something else is >>> already >>> mapped at that address. You don't want to have your CI blow up 1% of the >>> time due to this. >> >> It's just a hint though. Everything will still work if it doesn't get >> this exact address. > > > I don't see what it buys us then.
These are my thoughts: 1. We get an address before 4GB which is needed for grub (so far as I can tell) 2. It will normally be a nice, easy-on-the-eyes address 3. If it isn't, it will hopefully still be an address below 4GB 4. Even if not (e.g. on some very strange system) it will still allow sandbox to start up But anyway, as I said, this will never fail, it is just a hint. So I think your original comment is incorrect. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
