On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 07:03:04AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:14 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We have the following cases: > > - CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS was defined, migrate normally > > - CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS_MAX was defined and then used for > > CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS after a check, just migrate it over now. > > - CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS was very oddly defined on p2771-0000-* (to 1024 + > > 2), set this to 8. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > --- > > What are the chances of using defaults based on architectures? The > number of defconfig changes can go down, and those that need changes > that differ from their standard architecture can still do it.
Well, one of the things I'm wondering about is how many places really need / benefit from using something other than 4 or 8 and dropping the usage of 1/2/3/6/7 and just defaulting to 8 if 64bit, else 4. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
