Hi, On 16 November 2018 at 09:04, Simon Goldschmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am Sa., 3. Nov. 2018, 08:56 hat Simon Goldschmidt > <[email protected]> geschrieben: >> >> On 03.11.2018 07:08, Simon Glass wrote: >> > On 2 November 2018 at 14:28, Simon Goldschmidt >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Add possibility to update the serial parity used. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> drivers/serial/ns16550.c | 43 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> >> > >> > Ideally we should call this from sandbox (or a test) somewhere. >> >> Hmm, I'm a bit lost there. I haven't really used the tests so far and >> grep'ing through test/ does not show any reference to ns16550 either >> (where I could easily add a test). >> >> Did you mean adding a test for this specific driver (ns16550) or for the >> call to 'setconfig' in general? (Because I thought Patrice had already >> done that.) > > > Simon, any input on this? Does your comment somehow hold back this from > being pushed?
No, I added my review tag. It looks like serial_setconfig() is written without a struct udevice parameter. I think that should be fixed, since new functionality should use DM. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
