Hi! >> -ifdef CONFIG_CMD_USB >> +ifdef CONFIG_USB > > Shouldn't this be a separate change ?
Do you mean a separate patch set or its own patch? I was actually not 100% sure about this one but ran into link problems with the status quo. It seemed odd that this code would depend on the USB command. Maybe you can elaborate a little? >> obj-y += usb.o usb_hub.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_STORAGE) += usb_storage.o >> endif >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/Kconfig >> index 4fbe172e05..03746dd12f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/usb/Kconfig >> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ config DM_USB >> declared with the U_BOOT_USB_DEVICE() macro and will be >> automatically probed when found on the bus. >> >> +config SPL_DM_USB > > I think this should be introduced last, after all the core changes, > since this patch won't compile cleanly on it's own, will it ? Not sure, I understand. Just introducing a new Kconfig variable won’t change the “compilibility” of existing code?! Best, Sven _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
