> -----Original Message----- > From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On > Behalf Of eugen.hris...@microchip.com > Sent: 19 November 2018 08:23 > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: nicolas.fe...@microchip.com; > wenyou.y...@atmel.com > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91: lds: add test SPL > binary size and bbs size > > From: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.y...@atmel.com> > > Add the test for the SPL binary size and the bbs section size. > > Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.y...@atmel.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/arm926ejs/u-boot-spl.lds | 10 > ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/arm926ejs/u-boot-spl.lds > b/arch/arm/mach-at91/arm926ejs/u-boot-spl.lds > index eca78f8..82098dc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/arm926ejs/u-boot-spl.lds > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/arm926ejs/u-boot-spl.lds > @@ -48,3 +48,13 @@ SECTIONS > __bss_end = .; > } >.sdram > } > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE) > +ASSERT(__image_copy_end - __image_copy_start <
There is no __image_copy_start causing SPL size calculation to error, replacing with __start resolves it. > (CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE), \ > + "SPL image too big"); > +#endif > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE) > +ASSERT(__bss_end - __bss_start < > (CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE), \ > + "SPL image BSS too big"); > +#endif > -- > 2.7.4 > > ______________________________________________ > _ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
