On 11/21/2018 11:41 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com>
> 
> Add empty SPL fitImage configuration match. This can be extended
> if there is ever need to support multiple boards with single SFP
> image.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>

It's missing your SoB line, but again, why is this patch needed ?

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c
> index 67a4fac..2baeba6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c
> @@ -148,3 +148,13 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
>       config_dedicated_pins(gd->fdt_blob);
>       WATCHDOG_RESET();
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT
> +int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name)
> +{
> +     /* Just empty function now - can't decide what to choose */
> +     debug("%s: %s\n", __func__, name);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to