Hi Jagan,
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:40:56 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Setting mtd->priv to NULL is the best we can do. Thanks to
> > > that,
> > > + * the MTD layer can still call mtd hooks without risking a
> > > + * use-after-free bug. Still, things should be fixed to prevent
> > > the
> > > + * spi_flash object from being destroyed when del_mtd_device()
> > > fails.
> > > + */
> > > + sf_mtd_info.priv = NULL;
> > > + printf("Failed to unregister MTD %s and the spi_flash object is
> > > going away: you're in deep trouble!",
> > > + sf_mtd_info.name);
> >
> > Why do we need this print?
>
> Yes we do, just to keep the user informed that something bad happened
> and its spi-flash is no longer usable (at least through the MTD layer).
>
> > can't we do the same thing in MTD core
> > itself, so-that it can be generic for all flash objects.
>
> del_mtd_device() can fail, so it's the caller responsibility to decide
> what to do when that happens. Some users will propagate the error to
> the upper layer and maybe cancel the device removal (AFAICT,
> driver->remove() can return an error, not sure what happens in this
> case though). For others, like spi-flash, the device will go away, and
> all subsequent accesses will fail.
I'm about to send a new version fixing the problem I mentioned in patch
3, but before doing that, I'd like to know if my answer convinced you or
if you'd still prefer this message to go away (or be placed in
mtdcore/mtdpart.c).
Regards,
Boris
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
