On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 12:22:37AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 05.11.18 10:06, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > With an extra argument, efi_bootmgr_load() can now load an efi binary
> > based on a "BootXXXX" variable specified.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
>
> I don't see you changing the caller, so this hunk won't compile on its own?
You're correct.
> Please make sure that every single step in your patch set compiles.
I will try to double-check in the future.
> > ---
> > include/efi_loader.h | 3 ++-
> > lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
> > index d83de906fbce..ce0f420b5004 100644
> > --- a/include/efi_loader.h
> > +++ b/include/efi_loader.h
> > @@ -540,7 +540,8 @@ struct efi_load_option {
> >
> > void efi_deserialize_load_option(struct efi_load_option *lo, u8 *data);
> > unsigned long efi_serialize_load_option(struct efi_load_option *lo, u8
> > **data);
> > -void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> > +void *efi_bootmgr_load(int boot_id,
> > + struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> > struct efi_device_path **file_path);
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_LOADER) */
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> > index a095df3f540b..74eb832a8c92 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> > @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ error:
> > * available load-options, finding and returning the first one that can
> > * be loaded successfully.
> > */
> > -void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> > +void *efi_bootmgr_load(int boot_id,
> > + struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> > struct efi_device_path **file_path)
> > {
> > uint16_t *bootorder;
> > @@ -183,6 +184,11 @@ void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path
> > **device_path,
> > bs = systab.boottime;
> > rs = systab.runtime;
> >
> > + if (boot_id != -1) {
> > + image = try_load_entry(boot_id, device_path, file_path);
> > + goto error;
>
> I think at this point it might be better to split the function, no?
It's one way to fix, but I want simply to fix the issue by
modifying the caller, do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec() because
> You're not actually reusing any code from efi_bootmgr_load with the 2
> instantiation types (explicit boot id, loop through boot order).
I will add "BootNext" support to efi_bootmgr_load() so that it will be
a single point of loading. See my relevant patch:
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-November/349281.html
Thanks,
-Takahiro Akashi
>
> Alex
>
> > + }
> > +
> > bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
> > if (!bootorder)
> > goto error;
> >
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
