Hi Simon, Could you please point me to the update test you mean? (I assume it's "test_avb.py"?)
Thanks BR, Igor On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 22:52, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Igor, > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 10:45, Igor Opaniuk <igor.opan...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > AVB version 1.1 introduces support for named persistent values > > that must be tamper evident and allows AVB to store arbitrary key-value > > pairs [1]. > > > > Introduce implementation of two additional AVB operations > > read_persistent_value()/write_persistent_value() for retrieving/storing > > named persistent values. > > > > Correspondent pull request in the OP-TEE OS project repo [2]. > > > > [1]: > > https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/avb/+/android-9.0.0_r22 > > [2]: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/2699 > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opan...@linaro.org> > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > - fix output format for avb read_pvalue/write_pvalue commands > > - fix issue with named value buffer size > > > > cmd/avb.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > common/avb_verify.c | 122 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/tee.h | 2 + > > include/tee/optee_ta_avb.h | 16 ++++++ > > 4 files changed, 218 insertions(+) > > Doesn't this need an update to the Android update test? > > Regards, > Simon -- Regards, Igor Opaniuk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
