From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com>

While uclass_find_device() fails with -ENODEV in case of list_empty
strangely uclass_find_first_device() returns 0.

Fix uclass_find_first_device() to also fail with -ENODEV instead.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>

---

Changes in v3:
- Added Simon's reviewed-by.

Changes in v2:
- Update dm_test_uclass_devices_find() to test this behaviour as
  suggested by Simon.

 drivers/core/uclass.c | 2 +-
 test/dm/core.c        | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/core/uclass.c b/drivers/core/uclass.c
index a622f07941..fc3157de39 100644
--- a/drivers/core/uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/core/uclass.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int uclass_find_first_device(enum uclass_id id, struct 
udevice **devp)
        if (ret)
                return ret;
        if (list_empty(&uc->dev_head))
-               return 0;
+               return -ENODEV;
 
        *devp = list_first_entry(&uc->dev_head, struct udevice, uclass_node);
 
diff --git a/test/dm/core.c b/test/dm/core.c
index 260f6494a2..edd55b05d6 100644
--- a/test/dm/core.c
+++ b/test/dm/core.c
@@ -749,6 +749,10 @@ static int dm_test_uclass_devices_find(struct 
unit_test_state *uts)
                ut_assert(dev);
        }
 
+       ret = uclass_find_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_DUMMY, &dev);
+       ut_assert(ret == -ENODEV);
+       ut_assert(!dev);
+
        return 0;
 }
 DM_TEST(dm_test_uclass_devices_find, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to