On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> With this patch applied, we will be able to selectively execute
> an EFI application by specifying a load option, say "1" for Boot0001,
> "2" for Boot0002 and so on.
>
> => bootefi bootmgr <fdt addr> 1, or
> bootefi bootmgr - 1
You already introduced the support for BootNext. So is there a real benefit?
>
> Please note that BootXXXX need not be included in "BootOrder".
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
> ---
> cmd/bootefi.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmd/bootefi.c b/cmd/bootefi.c
> index 3be01b49b589..241fd0f987ab 100644
> --- a/cmd/bootefi.c
> +++ b/cmd/bootefi.c
> @@ -471,16 +471,15 @@ static efi_status_t bootefi_test_prepare
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST */
>
> -static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(void)
> +static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(int boot_id)
> {
> struct efi_device_path *device_path, *file_path;
> void *addr;
> efi_status_t r;
>
> - addr = efi_bootmgr_load(EFI_BOOTMGR_DEFAULT_ORDER,
> - &device_path, &file_path);
> + addr = efi_bootmgr_load(boot_id, &device_path, &file_path);
> if (!addr)
> - return 1;
> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>
> printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> @@ -488,9 +487,9 @@ static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(void)
> r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
>
> if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> - return 1;
> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>
> - return 0;
> + return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> /* Interpreter command to boot an arbitrary EFI image from memory */
> @@ -546,10 +545,28 @@ static int do_bootefi(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int
> argc, char * const argv[])
> } else
> #endif
> if (!strcmp(argv[1], "bootmgr")) {
> - if (efi_handle_fdt(argc > 2 ? argv[2] : NULL))
> - return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> + char *fdtstr, *endp;
> + int boot_id = EFI_BOOTMGR_DEFAULT_ORDER;
> +
> + if (argc > 2) {
> + fdtstr = argv[2];
> + /* Special address "-" means no device tree */
> + if (fdtstr[0] == '-')
> + fdtstr = NULL;
> +
> + r = efi_handle_fdt(fdtstr);
> + if (r)
> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> + }
> +
> + if (argc > 3) {
> + boot_id = (int)simple_strtoul(argv[3], &endp, 0);
> + if ((argv[3] + strlen(argv[3]) != endp) ||
> + boot_id > 0xffff)
> + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> + }
>
> - return do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec();
> + return do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(boot_id);
Why not communicate via the BootNext variable?
> } else {
> saddr = argv[1];
>
> @@ -590,7 +607,7 @@ static char bootefi_help_text[] =
> " Use environment variable efi_selftest to select a single test.\n"
> " Use 'setenv efi_selftest list' to enumerate all tests.\n"
> #endif
> - "bootefi bootmgr [fdt addr]\n"
> + "bootefi bootmgr [<fdt addr>|'-' [<boot id>]]\n"
> " - load and boot EFI payload based on BootOrder/BootXXXX variables.\n"
> "\n"
> " If specified, the device tree located at <fdt address> gets\n"
> @@ -598,7 +615,7 @@ static char bootefi_help_text[] =
> #endif
>
> U_BOOT_CMD(
> - bootefi, 3, 0, do_bootefi,
> + bootefi, 5, 0, do_bootefi,
Why 5?
Best regards
Heinrich
> "Boots an EFI payload from memory",
> bootefi_help_text
> );
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
