Hi Stefano, On 14.04.19 13:24, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Soeren, > > On 14/04/19 12:46, Soeren Moch wrote: >> Hi Stefano, >> >> On 14.04.19 11:52, stefano babic wrote: >>> Hallo Soeren, >>> >>> after pulling from Tom and merging u-boot-imx, - next, your board is not >>> buildable anymore. Better: it is buildable, but size exceeds: >>> >>> arm: + tbs2910 >>> +u-boot.imx exceeds file size limit: >>> + limit: 392192 bytes >>> + actual: 396288 bytes >>> + excess: 4096 bytes >>> >>> Just dropping CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION (I supposed EFI is not used on this >>> board), solves the issue. I can do myself in this way or let me know >>> what is your preferred way. >>> >> Hm, the full name of this board is "TBS2910 Matrix ARM mini PC", so it >> is supposed to provide a full PC environment. It supports booting from >> SATA, and such disk may as well be partitioned with EFI. It is really >> terrible to drop user visible features, just to support a new "driver >> model" that is supposed to ease life for developers, but in fact is much >> work and a real pain for maintainers of existing boards, and brings >> exactly nothing for the board's users. > I have explained my concerns in the past about footprint, too, but there > is nothing I can do. I know, therefore I cc'd Tom. > This is the way we have to go on and we have to > find solutions. > >> So much for that. Now to your question. >> >> Would be OK for me to drop CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION for now since it is more >> important to get this series merged, because other boards also depend on >> the SATA patches. We can readd EFI_PARTITION support later. For sure >> there will be more patches in this development cycle. >> But if you can wait a few hours, I will look for a better solution, or >> send a formal patch for this CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION removal. > Today is Sunday, I have also not expected you was fast to answer.... ;-) > > It is also fine for me to wait until tomorrow. OK, I will send a patch for that.
Regards, Soeren > I just want to sent PR to > Tom as soon as possible, because there are many developers waiting for > the merge from -next. tbs2910 is the only board with issues from Travis, > and I can confirm that it is still ok on u-boot-imx, next. Something new > is slipped down between 2019.rc4 and 2019.04 and at the end had > increased again the footprint. > > Thanks for checking this, > > Stefano Babic > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
