On 5/7/19 4:08 PM, Ang, Chee Hong wrote: > On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 15:03 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 5/7/19 7:07 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> From: "Ang, Chee Hong" <[email protected]> >>> >>> Notify Secure Device Manager (SDM) on the stage of HPS code >>> execution. >>> In general, there are three main code execution stages: >>> (1) First Stage Boot Loader (FSBL) which is U-Boot SPL. >>> (2) Second Stage Boot Loader (SSBL) which is U-Boot. >>> (3) Operating System which is Linux. >>> >>> Ang, Chee Hong (3): >>> ARM: socfpga: stratix10: Add HPS execution stage notification >>> function >>> ARM: socfpga: stratix10: To notify SDM when SPL pass control to >>> U-Boot >>> ARM: socfpga: stratix10: To notify SDM when U-Boot pass control >>> to >>> Linux >>> >>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/mailbox_s10.h | 7 +++++++ >>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/mailbox_s10.c | 6 ++++++ >>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_s10.c | 5 +++++ >>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_s10.c | 6 ++++++ >>> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+) >> Can we expect any of this mbox stuff to be ever migrated over to DM >> and >> moved into drivers/ instead of constantly adding stuff to mach- >> socfpga ? >> > These mailbox stuffs are basically a set of functions shared by SPL, u- > boot and Linux (PSCI) which is specific to our platform. Even if we > convert this mailbox stuffs to DM and move to drivers/, we still need > to duplicate those functions for PSCI which can be called by Linux. We > are starting to spend time converting our existing clock manager and > etc for S10 platform to DM and will move them to drivers/. > But we still need to keep those PSCI stuffs which are specific to our > platform in mach-sofcpga. > There was some discussion about the PSCI here: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg319458.html
-- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
