On 5/9/19 10:03 AM, Ang, Chee Hong wrote: > On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 08:59 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 5/9/19 7:52 AM, Ang, Chee Hong wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 22:20 -0700, chee.hong....@intel.com wrote: >>>> >>>> From: "Ang, Chee Hong" <chee.hong....@intel.com> >>>> >>>> Add "SYTEM_RESET" (cold reset) and "CPU_ON" (SMP) PSCI support >>>> for booting Linux on Stratix 10 platform. >>>> >>>> Ang, Chee Hong (3): >>>> ARM: socfpga: stratix10: Enable PSCI system reset >>>> ARM: socfpga: stratix10: Enable PSCI CPU_ON >>>> ARM: socfpga: stratix10: Enable PSCI support for Stratix 10 >>>> >>>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig | 9 ++++++- >>>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 3 +++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/psci.c | 56 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/psci.c >>>> >>> Hi Marek, >>> >>> Any comment on this ? These PSCI patches are needed for booting >>> Linux >>> on our S10 platform. >> Same questions as in Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Enable HPS execution stage >> notification , can we stop adding more and more stuff to arch/ and >> instead add it to drivers/ ? As you might have noticed, we are trying >> to >> remove stuff from arch/ and move as much as possible to drivers/ , >> but >> S10 is doing the exact opposite :( >> > Not all PSCI code fit in DM (drivers/). There should be a good place to > keep the PSCI code for our platform. Can you advise us where should we > place those PSCI implementation other than arch/ ?
Look through this discussion: https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg319458.html and possibly follow up on it. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot