On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:09:43PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > > Do you want to change this policy? > > > > (I'm just asking.) > > > I am using SCT a lot to test my patches. I want to be able to run the > > > tests on the final code. > > Wouldn't it be better to patch/fork the upstream SCT that blindly > > pulling in obsolete code that is basically already dead? > > > > > I have raised a ticket for upstream SCT but did not see any reaction up > > > to now. > > Got a reference to the ticket? > > > > > Making this deprecated protocol a config option deselected by default is > > > the most plausible solution to me. In the Kconfig comment I made it > > > clear that this protocol is going to be removed when the SCT has been > > > corrected. > > I disagree, I think if it's obsolete not having the code in the first > > case in the most plausible option IMO. > > Since it's hidden behind a default-n config option, I'd not be terribly > opposed to it. I do agree that fixing SCT is the better path forward. > > Leif, how long do you think fixing this properly in SCT is going to take?
Well, as usual, patches welcome :) However, I think the problem is more that the separate SCT area of bugzilla is a fairly recent addition and they forgot to change the default assignee to someone who actually works on SCT... I have now added the SCT maintainers to cc on https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1802 / Leif _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
