> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 5:49 PM > To: Prabhakar Kushwaha <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] travis.yml: Add buildman support for NXP's LS1028 & > LX2160 > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:47:12PM +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: > > > NXP's LS1028 and LX2160 platform build support added via buildman in > > travis.yml. > > > > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <[email protected]> > > --- > > .travis.yml | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index 8bd49ef1a5..e4e7e653f6 > > 100644 > > --- a/.travis.yml > > +++ b/.travis.yml > > @@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ matrix: > > - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS101x" > > env: > > - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&ls101" > > + - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS102x" > > + env: > > + - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&ls102" > > - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS104x" > > env: > > - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&ls104" > > @@ -192,6 +195,9 @@ matrix: > > - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LS20xx" > > env: > > - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&&ls20" > > + - name: "buildman NXP AArch64 LX216x" > > + env: > > + - BUILDMAN="freescale&aarch64&lx216" > > - name: "buildman i.MX6 (non-NXP)" > > env: > > - BUILDMAN="mx6 -x freescale,toradex,boundary,engicam" > > Are you sure the current jobs don't catch these? I thought I checked for > everything when I split it up. >
LX2 and LS1028A are new SoC added recently. But they are not getting build as part of default .travis.yml. This patch fix it. . > And on a related note, I look forward to switching to gitlab CI where we > control > the job timeout and can stop splitting things up so much. Is there any timeline about this transition. --pk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
