Hi Juergen,
On 6/12/2010 12:22 PM, Juergen Kilb wrote:
> From: Juergen Kilb<j.j...@phytec.de>
>
> The smc911x_detect function in /net/driver/net/smc911x.c
> returns a 0 if everything was ok (a chip was found) and -1 else.
> In the standalone example 'smc911x_eeprom' the return value
> of smc911x_detect is interpreted in a different way
> (0 for error, !0 as OK).
> This leads to the error that the chip will not be detected.
>
> Signed-of-by: Juergen Kilb<j.k...@phytec.de>
> ---
>
> examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> b/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> index 104047f..cb3c131 100644
> --- a/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> +++ b/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void dump_eeprom(struct eth_device *dev)
> static int smc911x_init(struct eth_device *dev)
> {
> /* See if there is anything there */
> - if (!smc911x_detect_chip(dev))
> + if (smc911x_detect_chip(dev))
> return 1;
>
> smc911x_reset(dev);
>
>
Applied to net/next.
regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
