Hi Prabhakar, On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:37, Prabhakar Kushwaha <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Joe, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Hershberger <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 12:26 AM > > To: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> > > Cc: Joseph Hershberger <[email protected]>; Prabhakar > > Kushwaha <[email protected]>; u-boot <u- > > [email protected]>; Joseph Hershberger <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] NXP LS1021A-TSN Board > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN > > > > > > > board, an evaluation platform built in partnership with > > > > > > > VVDN/Argonboards for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from > > > > > > > OpenIL, as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH. I picked up > > > > > > > Bin Meng's patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, > > same SoC): > > > > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2 > > > > > > > F%2Flists.denx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2018- > > May%2F330096.htm > > > > > > > > > l&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.com%7Cb56d806fd1 > > > > > > > > > d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0% > > > > > > > > > 7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=p3knnJglauV7ddeHwXZqFHJTTVk > > > > > > > vgIPINUzuVkH6e%2Fw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made > > > > > > > a few adjustments where necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TODO items: > > > > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary > > > > > > > for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port) > > > > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch > > > > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and > > > > > > > expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging), > > > > > > > once > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.d > > enx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2019- > > June%2F371563.html&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.c > > om%7Cb56d806fd1d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c > > 5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=dRUz6o%2FbaaRV > > Fy%2FTn4Qxx%2B%2Bbng2YmxMVWtUyknP2qHY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > is merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do > > > > > > that migration now or do it sometime later? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that > > > > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again. > > > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Joe > > > > > > > > > > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the > > > patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to > > > be? > > > > Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was > > planning > > to take it. > > > > I hope you have taken this patch-set
Yes, they are now applied to the u-boot-net tree: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-net/commits/master > > --pk > > Thanks! -Vladimir _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
