++ Xiaowei Bao (he is taking over from Chuanhua) > -----Original Message----- > From: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 3:05 PM > To: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua....@nxp.com> > Cc: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Prabhakar Kushwaha > <prabhakar.kushw...@nxp.com>; Priyanka Jain <priyanka.j...@nxp.com>; > Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bha...@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; > lu...@denx.de; tr...@konsulko.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] armv8: ls2088aqds: The ls2088aqds board supports > the I2C driver model. > > Dear Chuanhua Han, > > In message <20190726112403.32842-2-chuanhua....@nxp.com> you wrote: > > This patch is updating ls2088aqds board init code to support DM_I2C. > ... > > +struct reg_pair { > > + uint addr; > > + u8 *val; > > +}; > > + > > static void sgmii_configure_repeater(int serdes_port) { > > struct mii_dev *bus; > > uint8_t a = 0xf; > > - int i, j, ret; > > + int i, j, k, ret; > > int dpmac_id = 0, dpmac, mii_bus = 0; > > unsigned short value; > > char dev[2][20] = {"LS2080A_QDS_MDIO0", "LS2080A_QDS_MDIO3"}; > @@ > > -104,10 +109,30 @@ static void sgmii_configure_repeater(int serdes_port) > > uint8_t ch_b_eq[] = {0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x7}; > > uint8_t ch_b_ctl2[] = {0x81, 0x82, 0x83, 0x84}; > > > > + u8 reg_val[6] = {0x18, 0x38, 0x4, 0x14, 0xb5, 0x20}; > > + struct reg_pair reg_pair[10] = { > > + {6, ®_val[0]}, {4, ®_val[1]}, > > + {8, ®_val[2]}, {0xf, NULL}, > > + {0x11, NULL}, {0x16, NULL}, > > + {0x18, NULL}, {0x23, ®_val[3]}, > > + {0x2d, ®_val[4]}, {4, ®_val[5]}, > > + }; > > Argh... this is pretty much unreadable. Why do you use a pointer for "val" in > your struct reg_pair? > > Would it not be much simpler to use something like this: > > struct reg_pair { > uint addr; > u8 val; > } > ... > struct reg_pair reg_pair[] = { > {0x06, 0x18}, > {0x04, 0x38}, > {0x08, 0x04}, > {0x0F, 0}, > {0x11, 0}, > {0x16, 0}, > {0x18, 0}, > {0x23, 0x14}, > {0x2D, 0xB5}, > {0x04, 0x20}, > }} > ? > > Also, you should add some comments what all these magic numbers mean. As is, > nobody is able to understand what you are doing here. > This must be explained! > > Also, a comment should be added that (and why) some of the values get inserted > dynamically later down in the code. > >
Dear Wolfgang, Unfortunately this patch has been merged in main-line. But I will ask (Xiaowei Bao) to send patch to fix it. I will make sure to get fix in RC3 or RC4. --pk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot