On 10/10/19 11:29 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:43:46 +0200
> Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
>>> Why is this required? In the past we have rejected all new code adding
>>> defines instead of structs for register accesses. Have we changed our mind 
>>> now?  
>>
>> Who is we?
> 
> U-Boot maintainers/community.
> 
>> I haven't noticed that in the last 2 years. Plus Linux is rather
>> using structs than defines, or am I wrong?
> 
> The preferred way for I/O access is documented in [1], see "Use structures
> for I/O access" section.

This seems to not scale and I keep running into the problem where a few
registers changed between various mutations of the IP more and more often.

This seems to be the case here too.

[...]
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to