On 10/10/19 11:29 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:43:46 +0200 > Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote: > ... >>> Why is this required? In the past we have rejected all new code adding >>> defines instead of structs for register accesses. Have we changed our mind >>> now? >> >> Who is we? > > U-Boot maintainers/community. > >> I haven't noticed that in the last 2 years. Plus Linux is rather >> using structs than defines, or am I wrong? > > The preferred way for I/O access is documented in [1], see "Use structures > for I/O access" section.
This seems to not scale and I keep running into the problem where a few registers changed between various mutations of the IP more and more often. This seems to be the case here too. [...] _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot