On 27.11.19 13:55, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:03:03PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:22 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:11:00AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:21 PM Bin Meng <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> From: Lihua Zhao <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> Enhance do_bootm_vxworks() to support Linux compatible standard DTB >>>>> for ARM and PPC, when the least significant bit of flags in VxWorks >>>>> bootargs is set. Otherwise it falls back to the existing bootm flow >>>>> which is now legacy. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lihua Zhao <[email protected]> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <[email protected]> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> common/bootm_os.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>> doc/README.vxworks | 13 +++++++++++++ >>>>> include/vxworks.h | 3 +++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> It would be good if you pick this up for v2020.01. Thanks! >>> OK, thanks. I'll put this on my TODO list for soon. >> A gentle ping? > So the issue now is that this causes size growth and then link failure > on tbs2910. And I don't think "boot modern VxWorks kernels" is a new > CONFIG option I want to see. So I'm not quite sure what to do here yet. > Soeren, do you care about VxWorks support on this platform? Thanks! > I'm not aware of any user of VxWorks on tbs2910. So would be OK for me to disable CONFIG_BOOTM_VXWORKS in tbs2910_defconfig.
Do you want me to send a patch for this? Has this to go through the imx tree? I'm also happy to send an Acked-by instead, if this makes things easier. Regards, Soeren _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
