On 12/28/19 12:07 PM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 11:55, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de
<mailto:xypron.g...@gmx.de>> wrote:

    On 12/27/19 3:23 PM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
     > Enable support for random number generator on sandbox configs.
    This is
     > aimed primarily at adding unit test support for rng uclass.
     >
     > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org
    <mailto:sughosh.g...@linaro.org>>
     > Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@st.com
    <mailto:patrice.chot...@st.com>>
     > Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@st.com
    <mailto:patrick.delau...@st.com>>

    Why do you exclude:

    * configs/sandbox_flattree_defconfig,
    * configs/sandbox_spl_defconfig?


This was primarily aimed at adding a unit test for rng on a 32 bit and
64 bit target. Do you think adding support for rng on the two additional
targets is adding any value. I don't have a strong opinion on this. If
you think that i should enable rng on the two additional targets as
well, i will do so.

Also, can you also review the patch for adding efi_rng_protocol support
on qemu arm64 platform[1]. Once you have, i will make the changes and
send  the updated version.

-sughosh

I think we should add the RNT device to all configs so that we can test
in any of the contexts. But is nothing that would stop me from accepting
the patch series. We can add this later too.

Best regards

Heinrich


[1] - https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-December/394665.html

Reply via email to